Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
1. If armor makes you slower Shields should make you more detectable - in General Discussions [original thread]
J-Lewis wrote: Tharak Meuridiar wrote: I HATE this idea. Maybe this means something to a scout but as a heavy, that penalty is worthless. It's not like a blind man standing on another continent can't see us already. But sacrificing some if...
- by Tharak Meuridiar - at 2013.08.01 06:33:00
|
2. If armor makes you slower Shields should make you more detectable - in General Discussions [original thread]
I HATE this idea. Maybe this means something to a scout but as a heavy, that penalty is worthless. It's not like a blind man standing on another continent can't see us already. But sacrificing some if the little speed we have left. That means so...
- by Tharak Meuridiar - at 2013.07.31 02:08:00
|
3. So, uh, about aiming... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Buster Friently wrote: Himiko Kuronaga wrote: The game has turned into Explosions 514 because nobody can aim. When you can't aim, AoE weapons and movement reign supreme. Those are the paths of least resistance, an...
- by Tharak Meuridiar - at 2013.07.20 02:37:00
|
4. No Respec Petition - in General Discussions [original thread]
Signed. Respecs don't belong in this game
- by Tharak Meuridiar - at 2013.07.20 01:56:00
|
5. when fighting the SCR learn to move - in General Discussions [original thread]
For RP purposes I wish it worked better with the scram pistol. Maybe when they put out a level 3 sidearm like the flaylock for Amarr it will have a good Amarr sidearm for a companion.
- by Tharak Meuridiar - at 2013.07.20 00:31:00
|
6. What if only Scouts could use flaylocks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
The only reason I don't support it is that all other scouts would stay underpowered.
- by Tharak Meuridiar - at 2013.07.20 00:01:00
|
7. The Lav removal was the opposite of what we players asked for. So will be the ta... - in General Discussions [original thread]
@Jake- I've never argued that an LAVs primary function is ramming people. Just killing people. I'm fine with LAVs that make heavy use of their turrets instead of their bumpers. But at the moment that is not even a semi-viable role for LAVs. I've ...
- by Tharak Meuridiar - at 2013.07.19 15:23:00
|
8. My thoughts on the Cal logi nerf - in General Discussions [original thread]
ZDub 303 wrote: Thor Odinson42 wrote: I'm skilled to L5 in Electronics and pretty high in the other reduction of CPU usage skills and I won't be able to run proto equipment. Unless someone is paying me out of pocket I'll choose my life and ...
- by Tharak Meuridiar - at 2013.07.19 15:19:00
|
9. DUST514 and werewolves - in General Discussions [original thread]
I was actually making a reference to the most ridiculous monster I've seen in any game. In Magic The Gathering when I stuck wings on a deep sea kracken to create a FLYING DEEP SEA KRACKEN. One of the most amusing victories I've ever enjoyed.
- by Tharak Meuridiar - at 2013.07.19 14:46:00
|
10. buff small turrets, give lavs impact damage - in General Discussions [original thread]
A straight buff to small turrets would also be a pretty significant buff to HAVs and dropships. Some buff to those wouldn't go amiss but I personally believe LAV guns need to be at least 300% more effective. They are nearly useless from a moving ...
- by Tharak Meuridiar - at 2013.07.19 14:41:00
|
11. DUST514 and werewolves - in General Discussions [original thread]
I prefer flying krackens.
- by Tharak Meuridiar - at 2013.07.19 14:01:00
|
12. The Lav removal was the opposite of what we players asked for. So will be the ta... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Well then as I said, the turret needs a massive buff. I can't even remember the last time I was killed by an LAV's gunner. Make the turret deadly enough to justify the vehicle cost and 2 people needed to man a gunned LAV / 2 kills received if it ...
- by Tharak Meuridiar - at 2013.07.19 13:57:00
|
13. The Lav removal was the opposite of what we players asked for. So will be the ta... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Actually I guess we were both wrong, it's Light Attack Vehicle. Quote: The Light Attack Vehicle (LAV) represents a new generation of mobile support vehicle, an agile and effective unit, adept at assisting both infantry and other vehicles on t...
- by Tharak Meuridiar - at 2013.07.19 13:35:00
|
14. The Lav removal was the opposite of what we players asked for. So will be the ta... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Panther Alpha wrote: LAV = Light Assault Vehicle LIGHT... tanks are HEAVY, tanks are killing machines. NOT LAV's ... seriously... i just don't know... *Facepalm* Light = Fast & mobile. Any good LAV player uses it for hit & run / ...
- by Tharak Meuridiar - at 2013.07.19 12:41:00
|
15. The Lav removal was the opposite of what we players asked for. So will be the ta... - in General Discussions [original thread]
LAV = Light Assault Vehicle Their description mentions nothing about transportation but instead talks about how they are effective against infantry. They are nearly identical to / modeled after warthogs from Halo, which are quite effective in ...
- by Tharak Meuridiar - at 2013.07.19 12:27:00
|
16. Ambush Stacking Pubstomping Corps - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: My expectations are that once I have my new PS4: Fun times!! Plenty of new games in 1080p and if CCP is there on the PS4 then good and if not then too bad since the PS3 is going to be the old and busted. Tick tock!!! The...
- by Tharak Meuridiar - at 2013.07.07 21:53:00
|
17. Ambush Stacking Pubstomping Corps - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Solution: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=92547&find=unread
- by Tharak Meuridiar - at 2013.07.07 21:41:00
|
18. Flamethrower Discussion - in General Discussions [original thread]
I think a flamethrower would be great from the aspect that currently all the good close quarters weapons are designed for ambushing, or actually medium range weapons. Shotty and Nova knife are only really good if you get the drop on your opponent...
- by Tharak Meuridiar - at 2013.07.07 21:35:00
|
19. More 3x SP no respects - in General Discussions [original thread]
Funkmaster Whale wrote: I would trade 3x SP for some respect. There is a serious lack of respect from CCP. They should allow respect purchases with aurum, or at least give us some respect when they release new content. Come on CCP, where is the...
- by Tharak Meuridiar - at 2013.07.07 21:22:00
|
20. Define OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
APX147 wrote: If anything the AR needs a buff. I really liked the breakdown someone gave the other day of all the ways they died Quote: Here are the weapons I died to the most (This list is incredibly predictable) 37 Assault Rifle Dea...
- by Tharak Meuridiar - at 2013.07.07 11:00:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |